NEAR - Sponsor Image NEAR - Confidential swaps across 35+ chains Friend & Sponsor Learn more
Analysis

The SEC Just Opened a Legal Lane for Tokenized Stocks

The SEC's new Innovation Exemption lets permissioned AMMs trade tokenized, rights-bearing U.S. stocks for the first time.

The SEC Just Opened a Legal Lane for Tokenized Stocks

This morning, the SEC unveiled its first direct answer to crypto’s offshore tokenized stock boom: a 5 year exemption that lets permissioned automated market makers (AMMs) trade real, rights-bearing U.S. stocks under federal securities law.

The order, which the SEC is calling the Innovation Exemption, has landed just two days after Congress’s own crypto market structure bill, the Clarity Act, died in the Senate.

What’s in the order

First and foremost, the order institutes a standard that outlines what constitutes a Tokenized Securities Venue (TSV), i.e. a trading venue built around permissioned AMM liquidity pools that’s exempted from the legal definition of "exchange."

Secondly, the order calls for the liquidity providers inside those TSV pools to be exempted from the definition of "dealer." Traditional broker-dealers who show up to trade on a TSV still have all their obligations, of course, as this exemption only touches the venue and its LPs rather than the brokers routing orders to it.

These classifications and protections are effective immediately and continue the SEC’s recent intensified clarification efforts around crypto, following only a few months after the watchdog joined forces with the CFTC to release landmark guidance in the form of a new token taxonomy framework.

Decoding the SEC’s Token Taxonomy on Bankless

The new framework attempts to classify crypto assets and clarify securities law boundaries. Let's see where some of today's crypto assets belong.

Bankless

Enjoying this article?

Subscribe to Bankless or sign in

Notably, however, under this new order TSVs will only qualify as TSVs if they facilitate trades of true 1:1 tokenized versions of National Market System (NMS) stock, such that the tokens offer the same dividends, voting rights, and so forth as real shares. Synthetics or derivatives will be disqualifying.

There are additional stipulations, too, like TSVs must run on auditable smart contracts on permissionless chains; they must comply with OFAC rules; they must accept volume and ticker caps; and they must notify issuers and wait for potential vetoes before listing unaffiliated third-party stock tokens.

Fall out of bounds in any of these regards, and a TSV will lose its exempt status.

The open questions

This new exemption system naturally isn't meant for centralized exchanges that already have the capital and users to register properly but would rather skip the compliance lift. It's built for the decentralized, onchain side, e.g. Uniswap-style pools instead of Coinbase-style order books.

It’s also narrow, in the sense that this order doesn’t affect offshore synthetic markets and rule them out of existence. They’ll keep operating as they already do, and meanwhile there is now also a path to trading onshore in a compliant, rights-bearing way.

However, the toughest challenge for the practicality here is that this whole model is permissioned. Every TSV has to have certain gates, its pools allowlisted, its size within guardrails, and so on. Other projects like Robinhood’s Stock Tokens, Backed, Dinari, and xStocks aren’t so stringent; all you need is a wallet, and you can trade them.

This is to say that the bet the SEC is making, which remains to be proven, is that a compliant, permissioned, KYC’d system can outcompete offshore alternatives that are simply easier to use. Consider me skeptical, but then again maybe things stratify. Maybe offshore continues as the terrain of retail, and maybe TSVs become dominated by, and successful through, institutional adoption.

The issuer veto is its own wildcard, though. Maybe offshore synthetics has peeved issuers enough that legit, rights-bearing tokens will be something they openly embrace. Or maybe everyone wants as much control as possible and vetoes of TSV listings become so common that the system becomes untenable.

Whatever happens from here, though, this new order is a big deal, considering that it comes in stark contrast to what we saw out of the SEC in the agency’s previous Gensler era. It also comes strategically in the days after Clarity failed, offering a possible path toward more permanent crypto rules in the U.S.

Whether TSVs can transcend their limitations and peel significant volume won’t be clear for the foreseeable future as the system will take time to mature, but in the least it’s encouraging that the SEC proposed them, as this shows that the Commission is directly working on positively clarifying crypto’s onshore frontier. Bullish.

William Peaster

4 posts
No Responses